FRTB data-quality issues persist amid shifting start dates

Even the standardised approach poses tricky market and reference data challenges

rumor

Some banks are struggling to aggregate market and reference data of sufficient quality to comply with the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book ahead of the proposed 2025 deadlines.

One global systemically important bank (G-Sib) was forced to completely revamp the way it categorised data due to the difficulties presented by meeting the risk calculations of FRTB’s standardised approach (SA).

“We had to do a full audit of our data just to identify the source of the data,” says the G-Sib’s director

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here