JP Morgan’s ‘London whale’ losses spark VAR debate

In-house probe will look at role of internal model change, among other factors

chalkboard model

The $2 billion trading loss announced by JP Morgan Chase on May 10 has sparked debate about the role played by value-at-risk – with some experts casting VAR as an innocent bystander, while others see it more as a willing accomplice.

Today the loss prompted the bank to announce a reshuffle in which Ina Drew, head of the loss-making chief investment office (CIO) unit and a 30-year veteran of JP Morgan, leaves the firm. The bank is also carrying out its own investigation. A spokesman for JP Morgan

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here