Journal of Risk

Risk.net

A tale of two tail risks

Xin Huang

  • Banking credit risk is high in times of crisis and low in boom times, while the financial market jump hazard rate is the opposite.
  • Banking credit risk negatively affects the jump hazard rate.
  • The opposite behaviors of the two tail risks are attributable to the countercyclical nature of volatility.

The 2007–9 global financial crisis and the 2020–21 Covid-19 pandemic have highlighted the importance of understanding tail risks. In this paper, we study two types of tail risks – banking credit risk and the financial market jump hazard rate – and investigate their relationship. Based on two decades of daily credit default swap data and intraday equity and fixed-income futures data that include these two crises, we find a tale of two tail risks: banking credit risk is high during crises and low during booms, while the jump hazard rate is the opposite. Banking credit risk negatively affects the jump hazard rate. The opposite behaviors of the two tail risks are robust to the tests we use to detect jumps. The underlying statistical reason is the countercyclical nature of volatility, which is high in bad times and low in good times, leaving less room for jumps to occur in bad times and more room in good times.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here