CPMI-Iosco report highlights gaps in CCPs’ variation margin practices

Survey finds only a third implement VM pass-through, just 15% net client and house accounts

Central counterparties (CCPs) may not be fully implementing existing resilience guidance on variation margin (VM), a report by the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (CPMI-Iosco) suggests.

The resilience guidance published in 2017 outlines several goals including making VM calls more predictable, scheduling calls to accommodate participants’ needs and maintaining transparency with clearing members. Methods to achieve

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here