Lenders in the European Union lowered their probability-of-default (PD) estimates for corporate borrowers in Q2 for the fourth consecutive quarter.
The mean average weighted PD for corporate exposures, as gauged by EU banks for counterparties across 39 countries, was 2.1% in Q2 2019, down from 2.24% in the previous quarter and 2.43% a year prior.
The mean average weighted loss-given-default (LGD) estimate was 35.34%, up from 35.16% on the quarter but down slightly from 35.36% on the year.
Corporate PDs ranged from 0.63% for Swedish counterparties to 8.45% for Greek borrowers. LGD values were lowest for Danish corporates, at 22.44%, and highest for Chinese companies, at 47.29%.
Greek borrower PDs have declined the most of the 39-country sample, having averaged 11.8% in Q1. On the flip side, Italian debtor PDs have increased the most, with an average of 6.6% in Q2, compared with 6.12% in Q1.
Credit risk estimates for retail exposures also improved. The mean average weighted PD for these was 2% in Q2 2019, down from 2.31% three months prior and 2.70% in Q2 2018.
The mean average weighted LGD estimate for retail exposures was 26.09%, down from 26.28% in Q1 2019, but up from 25.49% in Q2 2018.
Swedish retail borrowers attracted the lowest average weighted PD estimates, at 0.36%, and Greek borrowers the highest, at 17.6%. Retail LGD percentages were lowest for Maltese debtors, at 8.72%, and highest for Indian debtors, at 52.17%.
Slovakian retail borrowers saw their PDs decline by the greatest extent among the 39 countries, to 1.27% in Q2 from 15.1% the quarter prior. Greek retail borrowers’ PDs increased the most, to 17.6% from 14.98%.
What is it?
The European Banking Authority produces quarterly credit risk parameters, based on data provided by EU banks that use internal-ratings based approaches. The disclosure is intended to increase transparency on the default rate, loss rate, PD and LGD of the retail and corporate counterparties of EU banks.
PDs are computed as a weighted average of non-defaulted exposures. Only statistics for countries with more than three banks reporting in that particular country are shown.
Why it matters
Borrower PDs and LGDs have a two-fold significance to banks. Firstly, they’re used to generate risk-weighted asset values for credit assets, which determine their associated capital charges. Secondly, they’re used as one input to set loss provisions under accounting standard IFRS 9.
Assets with high PDs and LGDs imply higher regulatory capital charges and provisions, making them expensive for banks to hold.
Various factors affect a borrower’s creditworthiness, including their national economic context – hence why Greek counterparties exhibit high PDs and LGDs. By the same token, though, improvements to a country’s economic outlook can filter through to the credit profiles of their corporate and retail borrowers. Again, this may explain why the credit parameters for Greek borrowers have improved in recent quarters as the country’s economy has recovered from the tumult of the eurozone crisis.
Get in touch
Sign up to the Risk Quantum daily newsletter to receive the latest data insights.
Let us know your thoughts on our latest analysis. You can drop us a line at abdool.bhollah@risk.net, or send a tweet to @RiskQuantum.
Tell me more
EU banks’ credit risk estimates continue to fall
Getting risk models runway ready
Greece leads EU on cutting toxic loans in Q2
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk Quantum
Commerzbank wager swells UniCredit’s modelled RWAs by 62.5%
Total return swaps on German shares inflate VAR and SVAR components
Consolidation of Arval exposures adds €20bn to BNP Paribas’ RWAs
Bank shifts exposures from soon-to-be retired equity IRB treatment to standardised approach
Russian loan liquidation lifts RBI’s risk density
Cash parked at sanctioned central bank carries higher capital requirements than original loans
CCPs’ skin in the game drops to historic low
Clearing members bear increasing load, analysis of 15 clearing houses shows
StanChart’s market RWAs hit eight-year high
Client-driven RWA deployment raises market risk exposure by $3.2 billion
Valley National sees surge in delinquent CRE loans in Q3
Bank’s net charge-off rate more than doubles as $114 million in CRE loans become past due
UBS logs three VAR breaches on legacy Credit Suisse positions
Bank risks higher capital charges amid market volatility and exit-related costs
HSBC’s China CRE provisions surge to cover one-fourth of book
Additional reserves and reduced exposure elevate ECL coverage for mainland portfolio