Two UK mortgage brokers banned over TCF failures
The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has banned two mortgage brokers in separate cases only weeks apart for failing to treat customers fairly (TCF). Aaron Nickols was banned from selling mortgage and general insurance products, after he used high-pressure sales techniques and failed to monitor staff adequately to ensure clients were treated fairly. Separately, the regulator said it had banned Noel Heaney after finding wide-ranging management and control problems across his firm and for failing to treat his customers fairly.
The FSA said Nickols, trading as Warwick Finance, was not fit and proper to run a mortgage and insurance business. He also failed to deal honestly with the FSA by making incorrect statements and not carrying out the improvements he had promised to make to the firm’s treatment of customers. The firm’s high-pressure sales approach included making unsolicited phone calls to the public, falsely claiming to represent well-known high street financial service providers and questioning the stability of customers’ existing policy providers to encourage the purchase of a new policy through Warwick. Staff also obtained direct debit details from potential customers and set up insurance policies in their names without permission. Customers’ specific needs were often not taken into account and training for staff was inadequate.
“By failing to treat his customers fairly, lacking the essential systems and controls to meet the FSA’s minimum regulatory requirements, and having an inappropriate attitude to the remedial action we outlined, Nickols poses a genuine risk to his customers and the financial system,” said Tom Spender, FSA head of retail enforcement. “High-pressure sales techniques and subterfuge have no place in a market that relies on honesty and integrity.”
Sanctions for high-pressure sales have been rare for small mortgage brokers, though more common for stock brokers, according to financial sources. The FSA’s enforcement actions should be seen in the wider context of an increasingly hawkish stance on its TCF regime. “If you want to conduct business, you must treat your customers fairly,” says Toby Parker, an FSA spokesperson. “Obviously we’re looking more into [this type of issue]. It is part of our move towards a tougher FSA enforcement team.”
The enforcement action against Heaney, trading as Heaney Finance in Lisburn, Northern Ireland, marks another example of TCF enforcement against a small firm. The FSA complained Heaney entrusted the management of his firm to an inexperienced employee, and then failed to provide training and support, combined with a lack of management information that could have helped him be informed about business conducted in his name. The regulator says this operational risk failing of weak controls in turn created the further risk of the firm being used by third parties to commit mortgage fraud. Furthermore, despite receiving advice from two compliance consultants as well as the regulator itself, he failed to rectify the failings or put a complaint handling procedure into effect.
“This case also highlights the effectiveness of our small firms’ assessment programme, where we engage with responsible small firms operating in the UK retail markets who recognise they have obligations to their retail customers. But, to continue helping consumers we must also continue to deal robustly with the firms and individuals who do not engage with us to ensure the fair treatment of their customers,” said Margaret Cole, the FSA’s director for enforcement and financial crime.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Integrated GRC solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
In the face of persistent digitisation challenges and the attendant transformation in business practices, many firms have been struggling to maintain governance and business continuity
Vendor spotlight: Dixtior AML transaction monitoring solutions
The Chartis Research report, AML transaction monitoring solutions, considers how, by working together, financial institutions, vendors and regulators can create more effective anti-money laundering (AML) systems.
Financial crime and compliance50 2024
The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control
Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective
Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…
Emerging trends in op risk
Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…
Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk
How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…