A new prudence
What prudent investments did financial services firms make in technology to improve compliance, reduce financial crime and lower their operational risk profile when times were good?
Where are the systems and controls that could have prevented so much of what has happened? Or helped mitigate the effects of problems at other firms?
Moreover, what attention did the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision pay to this issue?
The most important thing the Basel Committee could do today to prevent another crisis like the current one is to call together a group of 'wise men (and women)' to discuss how to improve the way financial services firms regard investment in op risk and compliance technology. I'm thinking here specifically about technologies to help improve operational systems and controls; prevent fraud, market abuse and other forms of financial crime; improve data security; and better enable enterprise-wide assessment and reporting on operational and compliance risks.
Financial stability isn't just about regulatory capital - Basel II was developed to specifically acknowledge that capital itself isn't enough, that it is risk management practices that make the difference between good firms and bad.
I say that technology matters too. And while regulators have no business getting involved in the nuts and bolts of just what firms buy and how they implement it, it seems to me that they have a vested interest as the Guardians of Financial Stability in fostering a meaningful dialogue with banks about what kinds of technology they should have in place, and with the solution providers about what they perceive as being important and helpful.
A model for this kind of dialogue could be the interaction between the industry and regulators around over-the-counter derivatives transaction processing. Regulators have used a mixture of carrot and stick to motivate the industry, and now the industry - having seen just how close disaster can come when deals don't get processed - is now seeing firms call on other firms to get the right kit in place.
Normally I believe that less can be more in terms of regulation, but when it comes to op risk and compliance technology investment, it seems to me that financial services firms have, for the most part, failed to have enough respect for the importance it can play not just for the survival of their own firms, but for the financial system at large. Regulators need to step in to help the industry raise its game.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Integrated GRC solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
In the face of persistent digitisation challenges and the attendant transformation in business practices, many firms have been struggling to maintain governance and business continuity
Vendor spotlight: Dixtior AML transaction monitoring solutions
The Chartis Research report, AML transaction monitoring solutions, considers how, by working together, financial institutions, vendors and regulators can create more effective anti-money laundering (AML) systems.
Financial crime and compliance50 2024
The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control
Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective
Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…
Emerging trends in op risk
Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…
Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk
How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…