Hedge funds are "disasters waiting to happen", says report
At least 30% of hedge funds have poor risk management that makes them "disasters waiting to happen", according to a report from consultancy Deloitte & Touche.
"Not using position and industry concentration limits is a disaster waiting to happen," the study's authors wrote. Of the companies surveyed, 14% did not use position limits and 30% did not use industry limits. The most widespread red flag was a failure to measure off-balance-sheet leverage while holding assets with embedded leverage – 50% of companies surveyed fell short in this area.
Inadequate testing is also widespread in the industry: according to Deloitte & Touche, only 60% of companies perform both stress and correlation testing during portfolio value-at-risk calculations. "Using VAR without doing both stress and correlation testing definitely raises a red flag, since without them VAR does not give a complete picture of risk," the authors commented.
In terms of operational risk, hedge funds are also inadequately prepared, the survey found. Half of all hedge fund failures can be traced to operational risk, but less than half of the funds surveyed updated their operational risk management plans often enough – plans should be updated at least annually, the survey said.
The survey looked at risk management practices of 60 hedge fund advisers worldwide, with a total of $75 billion under management - 6% of the global hedge fund industry.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Market risk
Market risk solutions 2023: market and vendor landscape
A Chartis Research report that examines the structural shifts in enterprise risk systems and the impact of regulations, as well as the available technology.
The new rules of market risk management
Amid 2020’s Covid-19-related market turmoil – with volatility and value-at-risk (VAR) measures soaring – some of the world’s largest investment banks took advantage of the extraordinary conditions to notch up record trading revenues. In a recent Risk.net…
ETF strategies to manage market volatility
Money managers and institutional investors are re-evaluating investment strategies in the face of rapidly shifting market conditions. Consequently, selective genres of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are seeing robust growth in assets. Hong Kong Exchanges…
FRTB spurs data mining push at StanChart
Bank building “single golden source” of trade data in a bid to lower NMRF burden
Asian privacy laws obstruct FRTB data pooling efforts
Bank scepticism and regulatory hurdles likely to inhibit cross-border information sharing
Seizing the opportunity of transformational change
Sponsored Q&A: CompatibL, Murex and Numerix
Doubts grow over US FRTB implementation
Fragmented roll-out would price European banks “out of the market”
Basel group shake-up has banks hoping for FRTB changes
Barger and Durand replaced by BoE's Nesbitt; banks want fresh look at P&L test