Stage fright: lenders still struggling with IFRS 9 transitions

Divergence in how banks move loans between stages of impairment prompts regulators to push for more homogenous approach

Financial regulators face a perennial dilemma: create rules that are too prescriptive and not all firms will be able to follow them. Allow more leeway, and firms will interpret the rules in disparate ways.

Accounting standards introduced in Europe in 2014 require banks to increase loan provisions in response to any significant deterioration in credit quality. But defining the word ‘significant’ has proven subjective, to the extent that regulators are becoming uncomfortable with the lack of

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here