CME pulls client default rule change after pushback

FCMs claim proposal gave clearing house too much power in customer defaults

CME Group
Photo: Marco Verch/Flickr

CME Group has temporarily withdrawn a controversial rule change after pushback from major clearing firms, who argued the proposal gave the bourse too much power to intervene in the management of a client default.

Futures commission merchants (FCMs) managing a client in default often look to transfer the stricken firm’s positions to their own house account. But in a filing with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission on August 11, CME proposed barring such transfers unless the CME’s chief

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here