OpRisk Europe and North America wrap: cyber, 3LOD and the SMA
Future of op risk modelling a hot topic at conference, along with evolving three lines of defence framework
Whatever the topic under discussion at the OpRisk Europe and North America conferences this month, the conversation inevitably turned to cyber risk. That’s hardly surprising: cyber risk, in its many guises, is an ever-present, ever-mutating danger for banks, consistently ranked the top threat in an institution’s operational risk framework. It also has an increasingly strong bearing on all the other risks in Risk.net’s annual industry poll, from fraud to outsourcing.
Regulators and practitioners alike at both conferences highlighted the business continuity risks posed by a major cyber attack, emphasised the need for rapid recovery from an outage, and called on businesses to improve their planning and modelling.
Banks are still adapting to the threat of attacks, evolving their own three lines of defence (3LOD) frameworks to better incorporate cyber risk, and channelling expertise from other functions across the bank such as IT and information security – and, increasingly, from other industries.
Many practitioners spoke openly about the need for constant fine-tuning of the 3LOD framework if it is to work successfully for larger banks, including the need for a clearer delineation of responsibility between risk managers and front-office staff when it comes to ‘owning the risk’.
Another much-discussed topic was the Basel Committee’s off-again, on-again standardised measurement approach (SMA) to operational risk capital calculation. Banks lamented the lost investment in bespoke models should the framework enter force, while others expounded the benefits of modelling smaller op risk events to help prevent losses in future.
To read more, please click on the articles below.
Fed official: banks must recover from cyber attack in two hours
“If you’re waiting for us to give you regulation, you’re behind the curve,” says Fed’s Ferlazzo
CCAR aids in op risk identification, banking experts say
Banks forced to consider link between risks and macroeconomic factors
Fed examiner calls on banks to rethink KRIs
Most banks fail to establish explicit link between KRIs and identified risk exposures
Banks move to model smaller op risk losses
Credit Suisse is using scenario analysis to model the risks associated with internal fraud losses
Better data key to cyber risk underwriting, say practitioners
Lack of loss data means predictions are a problem
OCC warns on cyber risks from subpar patches at US banks
Regulator says banks have good track record overall, but exams reveal weaknesses
Cyber insurance not a risk management tool, say banks
Lengthy payout mechanism of cyber policies makes it ineffectual against large losses, dealers argue
Three lines of defence model still evolving, say practitioners
Clearer split in responsibilities between first and second lines needed, say op risk chiefs
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
For banks, change risk is inevitable; managing it, optional
Regional bank survey shows steady growth of dedicated change risk functions and adoption of leading indicators
Clearing members ponder the purpose of CME’s mystery FCM
Some think licence will be used to boost crypto clearing capacity, but many questions remain
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
As supplier risk grows, banks check their third-party guest lists
Dora forces rethink of KRI and appetite frameworks amid reappraisal of what constitutes a key counterparty
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Quant Finance Master’s Guide 2025
Risk.net’s guide to the world’s leading quant master’s programmes, with the top 25 schools ranked
Regionals built first-line defences pre-CrowdStrike
In-business risk teams vary in size and reporting lines, but outage fears are a constant
Op risk data: Santander in car crash of motor-finance fail
Also: Macquarie fined for fake metals trade flaws, Metro makes AML misses, and Invesco red-faced over greenwashing. Data by ORX News