CCPs need thicker skins - Citi analysis

In the absence of regulatory requirements, CCPs are putting a tiny amount of their own capital into default waterfalls – equivalent to just 2.6% of the combined guarantee funds of the five biggest swaps clearers. Here, clearing specialists at Citi outline an analytical approach to calculating CCP skin-in-the-game

citi-canary-wharf

As the volume of over-the-counter derivatives trades being processed by central counterparties (CCPs) has surged in recent years, another important number has remained largely static – the contribution clearers make to their default waterfalls. At the leading OTC CCPs, so-called ‘skin in the game' (Sig) stands at 2.6%, on average, of their combined guarantee funds (table 1).

While CCPs are held to stringent regulatory risk management standards for both initial margin calculation and overall

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here