Lehman vs Moore in swaps safe harbour showdown
Lehman Brothers is claiming a series of inter-affiliate transfers by Moore Capital robbed it of $20 million of derivatives termination payments at the time of the bank’s collapse. The resulting test of the US bankruptcy code has profound implications for swaps
Seven years after its bankruptcy filing, Lehman Brothers has the potential to again upend the derivatives market – this time, by weakening one of its legal cornerstones, the right to immediately net and settle trades with a defaulted counterparty, rather than waiting in line during the bankruptcy process.
Lawyers for Lehman's estate claim New York-based hedge fund Moore Capital misused this safe harbour – part of the US bankruptcy code – in 2008 to cut $20 million from the sum it owed the bank
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Margin standards are here – and clearing firms aren’t happy
Clearing members complain that latest transparency proposals would force them to act as middlemen by providing margin simulation tools for clients
Riding the storm: banking in the era of climate risk
Climate-related risk is playing an increasing role in banks’ future strategies, resilience and prosperity
Buffer stop: Eurex clearing members shunt default fund
Clearing house’s CRO says both members and clients opt to pay more margin instead
How a serverless risk engine transformed a digital bank
Migrating to the cloud permitted scalability, faster model updates and a better team structure
During Trump turbulence, value-at-risk may go pop
Trading risk models have been trained in quiet markets, and volatility is now looming
Osttra to launch Treasury clearing middleware
Mid-year delivery expected for system that aids credit checking for repo trades
Banks divided over CME’s done-away model for UST clearing
Buy side could give thumbs-up if questions on margin protection and guarantee fees are answered
Why JP Morgan’s Santos wants to make bad news travel fast
Asset management CRO says sharing information early holds the key to avoiding surprises
