Back-testing expected shortfall: mission possible?
Shifting from value-at-risk to expected shortfall in trading book capital rules makes back-testing difficult, or even impossible. Regulators say continuing to test VAR is sufficient, but that leaves out the tail – the main reason for the change. Laurie Carver reports
More conservative, but harder to check – that, in a nutshell, is the consensus on expected shortfall, the mooted replacement for value-at-risk as the basis for modelled trading book capital requirements. The question is whether a way can be found to back-test the measure and, if not, how big a problem that is.
Expected shortfall was proposed as a replacement for VAR in the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's initial draft of its trading book capital overhaul in May 2012 – the Fundamental
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op Risk Benchmarking 2024: the banks
As threats grow and regulators bore down, focus shifts to the first line
Fed stress-testing operational readiness of discount window
Experts say consultation on improved ops should be accompanied by focus on willingness to borrow
Millennium risk manager defends leverage in basis trade
“Gross notional measures don’t equate to market risk,” says Scott Rofey
Banks feel regulatory heat on op resilience
Op Risk Benchmarking: supervisors dial up reporting expectations and on-site inspections
BofA’s rates revamp leans into multi-strategy boom
New rates head Laura Chepucavage prioritises collateral efficiency, e-trading and central risk book for enlarged rates, futures and financing unit
Revolutionising credit surveillance: part two
Does GenAI live up to the hype? How prioritising AI and digitisation projects reveals data as the power behind AI initiatives
Elevating risk management to a strategic partner in investment decision-making
How risk management is evolving from a compliance role to a strategic partner, highlighting such themes as collaboration with portfolio teams, forward-looking approaches, advanced analytics and integrating emerging risks, enabling firms to navigate…
Withholding tax trips up Eurex agency clearing model
Clearing members rely on CCP to resolve potential problem with German tax authorities
