Survey shows modifications could lower Basel II credit risk charges

Banks using a more complex risk measurement approach under the Basel II bank accord, if potential modifications are put in place, would have lower credit risk capital charges than under the current Basel I accord.

This is the view of global banking regulators following the release of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s QIS 2.5 study in early July.

A key aim of the of the proposed risk-based Basel II capital adequacy accord is to ensure that that there would be an incentive for banks to use the so-called foundation internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to calculating credit risk capital charges.

The results of so-called QIS 2.5, a limited quantitative impact study conducted in November last

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here