Compliance by default

Capital requirements for market risk are set to change dramatically under proposed new rules to capture incremental default risk. Alan Smillie and Eduardo Epperlein take a look at the rules as they stand, suggest an alternative way forward and discuss some of the key technical challenges in modelling default risk in the trading book

Until 2005, it seemed that market risk would be relatively unaffected by the introduction of Basel II, in contrast to the sweeping changes to the rules for credit and operational risk. The first indication of material changes to the market trading risk regime was given by regulators in their consultative document of April 2005 and in their final amendment to Basel II, issued in July 2005 (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2005a). The July 2005 document required banks to explicitly model

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here