Systems failure

Banks have long boasted about the power, speed and efficiency of their enterprise-wide risk management systems. But the recent crisis indicates many firms were putting too much reliance on model outputs, without challenging the data. What are banks and software vendors doing to strengthen risk processes? Clive Davidson reports

risk-0708-19-gif

The finger of blame has pointed in many directions in the post mortem of the past year's subprime debacle and credit crisis. Over-optimistic rating agencies, lax regulators, negligent senior managers, ivory tower model makers, the models themselves, inadequate stress tests - the list of who or what might be culpable goes on and on. Risk management systems - the technology that is supposed to help banks identify their exposures and avoid losses - have not escaped the battery of accusations.

Both

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here