LCR changes result from regulatory high-wire act

The recent easing of the Basel III liquidity coverage ratio is welcome, but highlights the difficult – perhaps impossible – regulatory challenge of striking the right balance in a world of too-big-to-fail banks, writes David Rowe

david-rowe

The difficulty regulators face in balancing bank safety and soundness against credit supply and economic growth first became a practical reality for me in 1987. The first Basel capital accord was coming into effect in January 1988 and banks were busily trying to comply. Many of their customers, meanwhile, were complaining about a credit squeeze in which even good, established borrowers were having problems. A colleague pointed out that these two developments were directly related, and the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here