Commission suggests 'possible further changes' to CRD
A consultation paper from the European Commission announces potential further amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive
BRUSSELS - Possible further changes to the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) are the subject of a new consultation paper released by the European Commission, potentially adding to the two sets of revisions already announced.
The fresh revisions would come on top of amendments agreed by member states and the European Parliament in April, and a proposal adopted by the Commission on July 13.
The new proposals follow on from commitments made in the Commission's March 4 announcement at the Spring European Council, which included addressing pro-cyclicality through counter-cyclical provisioning; removing national discretions to limit legislative differences across borders; and addressing leverage or liquidity risk through "supplementary measures" to existing risk-based requirements - including future consultation on a leverage ratio.
The Commission has set an unusually short deadline for responses of September 4. This, it states, is justified because the amendments are part of its ongoing response to the financial crisis, and the Commission has a short timetable to come forward with a legislative proposal by October.
A separate legislative proposal will be released "soon" - no specific has been deadline set - that the Commission says will aim to "restrain excessive and unsustainable balance-sheet growth through a leverage ratio measure".
The earlier proposals made on July 13 aimed specifically to improve banks' capital, requiring higher capital holdings for re-securitisations, tightened disclosure requirements for securitisations, and a reappraisal of risks in trading books in stressed conditions, also leading to heightened capital levels.
The legislative paper stipulated improvements to remuneration structures, saying supervisors will have new powers to impose sanctions on banks whose pay policies are found to be incompatible with sound risk management - potentially leading to fines or higher capital charges.
Click here to read the new consultation paper.
Click here to read the July 13 proposal
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US