Energy Risk Europe: Remit language too loose, say panellists

Weaknesses exist in the language of new rules meant to prevent use of insider information and other forms of market abuse in the wholesale energy sector

European Union flag

Panellists at Energy Risk Europe's regulatory round table yesterday raised concerns about the European Union's (EU) Regulation on Energy Market Integrity and Transparency (Remit). The new rules, which will come into force in December, have energy firms worried about perceived weaknesses in the language of the legislation and the rapidity of its implementation by energy firms.

Earlier this week, the EU formally adopted the new Remit legislation, which had been approved by the European Parliament in mid-September. This is fairly rapid treatment for EU legislation, which had only been proposed in December 2010. It is expected to be published in the EU's official journal by the end of November, which would make it binding 20 days later, in December.

The legislation extends the framework against market abuse and insider trading that already exists in the securities industry to the EU wholesale energy markets, and is designed to complement new proposals to expand the scope of the Market Abuse Directive to cover derivatives, including energy derivatives and emissions trading. It will require firms to provide detailed transaction records to the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators and to register with their national regulator.

But round-table panellists said the speed with which the legislation – a priority for the Hungarian presidency of the EU – has been implemented means the definition of insider trading is too loose.

"This piece of legislation enjoyed broad support in the parliament and maybe therefore not much attention was put to the details in the wording," said Gerd Stuhlmacher, director of legal and compliance at E.on Trading. "So maybe, therefore, nobody really spotted the weaknesses in the language. But if you look into the text carefully, you will find some weaknesses."

Panellists called for a greater discussion around the definition of insider information in the new rules. They also expressed concern about the fact that regulatory guidance around the EU legislation would not be published before they had to comply with the new rules in December.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here