![Risk.net](https://nginx.production.bb8-risk.uk3.amazee.io/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
US regulatory guidance for compensation structures snubs FDIC proposal
Final pay guidance from US regulators shows no trace of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) proposal for higher premiums for banks with risky compensation structures
![federal reserve federal reserve](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/728/60728/federal-reserve-building-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=GY3wxg4h)
Final guidance on banking pay structures agreed this week by US regulators contains no evidence of the January FDIC suggestion that banks with risky remuneration structures should contribute higher premiums to the (FDIC-administered) banking deposit insurance fund.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Office of Thrift Supervision and the FDIC joined the Federal Reserve in releasing the guidelines on June 21. The new jointly issued paper builds on draft proposals put forward
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
During Trump turbulence, value-at-risk may go pop
Trading risk models have been trained in quiet markets, and volatility is now looming
Bank of England mustering unit to model system-wide stresses
Permanent team at UK supervisor will work on buy- and sell-side interactions
Regis-TR and the Emir Refit blame game
Reporting overhaul was marred by problems at repositories, prompting calls to stagger future go-live dates
Iosco pre-hedging review: more RFQs than answers
Latest proposals leave observers weighing new clampdown on pre-hedging
FCMs welcome CFTC margin rule ring-fencing clarification
Final rule on separate accounts replicates no-action relief as Republicans strip out gold plate
Stuck in the middle with EU: dealers clash over FRTB timing
Largest banks want Commission to delay implementation, but it’s not the legislator’s only option
Treasury clearing timeline ‘too aggressive’ says BofA rates head
Sifma gears up for extension talks with incoming SEC and Treasury officials
Rostin Behnam’s unfinished business
Next CFTC chair must finish the work Behnam started on crypto regulation and conflicts of interest