Bank of Italy defends change on capital accounting
Allowing banks to ignore falling bond prices for capital purposes is a legitimate move, says regulator
The Bank of Italy has defended its decision on May 18 to permit Italian banks to ignore changes in the value of government bonds when calculating their capital ratios. Previously, Italian banks would have had to take account of falling market prices and add more capital accordingly, while a rise in the price would only be partially included – the same treatment accorded to equities. Under the new rule, unrealised gains and losses on European government bonds will be ignored unless the bonds become permanently impaired - other bonds would continue to be treated as before.
"The measure is not unconventional," a bank spokesman said, pointing out that France, Germany and the UK already apply the same rule, which is one of two options permitted by the Committee of European Bank Supervisors. "Far from introducing a competitive advantage for Italian banks, the regulation restores the level playing field on the prudential treatment of government bonds in a context of higher market volatility," the spokesman added.
€185 billion in Italian government securities is held by Italian banks as of the end of March, according to the most recent figures from the Bank of Italy (they also hold another €6.7 billion of non-Italian European government debt).
Of this, Unicredit reportedly holds €50 billion and Intesa SanPaolo €55 billion, though it's not clear how much of this would be held as 'available for trading' and therefore qualify for the new treatment. Unicredit has a €928 billion balance sheet as of the end of 2009, of which €134 billion is held for trading. Its €58 billion in regulatory capital gives it a total capital adequacy ratio of 12.88%. Intesa SanPaolo reports regulatory capital of €43 billion and a capital ratio of 11.9%. Of its €150 billion balance sheet at the end of March 2010, €39 billion was held for trading. Neither bank responded to requests for comment.
If the move was intended to bolster Italian government bonds by making Italian banks more likely to hold them, it has had little visible impact: five-year Italian debt traded at 101.612 late on May 20, up slightly from 101.572, where it closed on May 17, before the measure was announced. Five-year CDSs on Italian sovereign debt stood at 142.915 basis points, down slightly from 143.5bp on May 17. Analysts estimate the rule change has prevented a €600 million reduction in regulatory capital across the sector, equivalent to a reduction of 6bp in core Tier 1 capital ratios.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB IMA
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements
Republican SEC may focus on fixed income – Peirce
Commissioner also wants a revival of finders’ exemption, more guidance for UST clearing
Streamlining shareholding disclosure compliance
Shareholding disclosure compliance is increasingly complex due to a global patchwork of regulations and the challenge of managing vast amounts of data
Banks take aim at Gruenberg’s brokered deposit rule
Regulatory lawyers question need to reverse 2020 rulemaking just four years later