Risk.net

GAO urges curbs on 'tying'

The General Accounting Office has recommended that bank regulators take additional measures to adequately enforce laws against the tying of commercial credit to more lucrative investment banking business, despite a lack of hard evidence to support accusations that the practice may be widespread.

    • Saskia Scholtes
  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  
In a report commissioned by Congressman John Dingell, who has repeatedly called for regulators to clamp down on banks that infringe anti-tying laws, the GAO says that it was unable to find documentary evidence to substantiate the charges, partly because the large majority of credit negotiations are conducted orally. But according to the GAO, more in-depth investigations should be conducted in future.

House Financial Services Committee chairman Michael Oxley, says: “The GAO found little evidence of widespread tying practices at commercial banks with their investment banking affiliates, but the study underscores the importance of continued vigilance.”

According to the GAO report, regulators have so far focused their enquiries on interviews with the banks and transaction-specific reviews, and have failed to include more broad-based transaction testing and interviews with corporate borrowers.

The GAO recommends that “banking regulators may have to obtain other forms of indirect evidence to assess whether banks unlawfully tie products and services.”

The report also shows that many corporate borrowers are confused by the anti-tying regulations, and that banks’ interpretations of the law and its exceptions can occasionally contain substantial variations. And although the Federal Reserve recently issued a new draft interpretation for public comment, the GAO has suggested that additional guidance on the laws is needed.

Congressman Dingell, the report’s sponsor, agrees. In a letter to the Fed’s Alan Greenspan, he wrote: “The interpretation is overly complex...and I continue to see many pitfalls for the wary and unwary alike…The tone of the document appears to be tilted toward a ‘wink and nod’ approach to non-compliance.”US Credit

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.

As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net

Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.

You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net

More on Regulation

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here