
ScotPower’s £400m dollar hedging boon
International energy firm ScottishPower said last week it made £400 million ($728 million) from hedging its US dollar revenues.
The firm’s dollar exposure arises from its US subsidiary PacifiCorp, the Oregon-based electric utility it bought in 1999.
Treasurer Adrian Coats in Glasgow said the board took the decision to reprice the forwards, transacted largely with JP Morgan and Citigroup, in mid-to late-March.
Bank derivatives sales dealers recently reported that some corporate treasurers face pressure from their boards of directors not to use derivatives to hedge currency exposure. But Coats said this was not the case at ScottishPower.
However, Coats conceded, ScottishPower may face more difficulties hedging its balance sheet in the future after the 2005 implementation of new accounting standard IAS 39, which requires firms to mark derivatives positions to market.
This is not the first time ScottishPower has reaped the rewards of shrewd risk management. In 2002, it enjoyed a £60 million mark-to-market gain on its hedges, as a result of interest rate fluctuations. It was also one of the few energy companies to emerge unscathed from the Enron crisis, as a result of stringent credit risk controls.
ScottishPower was named Risk's corporate risk manager of the year 2003.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Gilt repo clearing mandate on Bank of England’s radar
Sources say regulator mulling benefits of US-inspired regime, but is non-committal
Delving into the European Commission’s proposed overhaul of FRTB
Raft of potential changes would benefit both IMA and SA banks – but only temporarily
Why the survival of internal models is vital for financial stability
Risk quants say stampede to standardised approaches heightens herding and systemic risks
Crypto custody a bit(coin) closer after US accounting U-turn
Federal banking supervisors expected to eventually relax regimes for safeguarding digital assets
Japan’s regulator stands firm behind Basel as peers buckle
Japanese banks fear being at a disadvantage to rivals as Basel III implementation falters
EU racing to comply with active account rules
Industry wants simpler route to exemptions ahead of ‘challenging’ deadline for new clearing regime
CFTC acting chair: ‘We don’t need a Dodd-Frank for crypto’
US regulator wants real-time market surveillance; focuses on rise of liquidity risk
Large banks safer for CCPs than they get credit for
Plentiful pre-positioned liquidity softens the blow of resolution, new research argues