Sliced and sliced again: investors’ latest trick for risk transfer

‘Retranched’ synthetic securitisations offer higher yields, but questions remain over legality of structures

Investors have found a clever – if legally questionable – way to boost the returns of synthetic risk transfer (SRT) deals issued by US banks.

Tougher regulatory requirements in the US mean banks must bundle a larger portion of the risk in their loan portfolios to achieve meaningful capital savings from synthetic securitisations – resulting in a ‘thicker’ junior tranche.

The resulting lower coupons have led some investors to explore ways of boosting returns. A method gaining traction known as

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here