EU urged to recognise different op risk profiles of investment firms
MONTE CARLO - The European Union's plans to make investment firms as well as banks reserve capital against operational risk must acknowledge that one size does not fit all firms in the financial services industry, a leading European financial regulator argued in early July.
He added it may be necessary to consider a further breakdown of the business lines proposed for measuring operational risk in Basel II in order to allow for a more risk-sensitive operational risk charge based on different scaling factors for different categories of business.
Basel II will determine how much of their assets large international banks in the Group of 10 leading economies must set aside as reserve capital to guard against banking risks from 2005. For the first time the banks will have to reserve capital specifically against the risk of losses from operational hazards such as fraud, technology failure and trade settlement errors.
The European Commission, the EU's executive arm, wants to apply its third capital adequacy directive, which is modelled closely on Basel II, to all banks and investment firms in the 15-nation EU.
The EU's plan has provoked strong criticism from investment management firms and stockbrokers who argue that it will result in damaging increases - of as much as 250% in some cases - in the amount of regulatory capital they will have to set aside. The critics have also argued that the number of business lines nominated by the Baseland EU regulators should be extended to accommodate the differences between banks and other financial firms.
Davies told a conference in Monte Carlo the FSA, the UK's principal financial watchdog, is clear that operational risk capital charges "must be part of the equation in the long run".
But he acknowledged "the initial Basel calibration generated operational risk charges which, for investments firms and fund managers in particular, seem to be well above what might be reasonably required."
Davies agreed with critics that a simple extrapolation to investment firms produced percentage increases for fund managers that were in some cases "quite outlandish".
Meanwhile, FSA officials are urging UK banks and institutions to return as soon as possible the information required by the Commission for its study of the impact of an op risk capital charge on European financial firms. That's despite the Commission's extension of the deadline for the return of data to October 1 from early July.
The extension of the deadline followed the June decision of the architects of Basel II, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, to postpone the coming into effect of the accord to 2005 from 2004.
But FSA sources say the information from the EU's impact study is needed to complement the op risk data received from the Basel Committee's own quantitative impact studies, namely QIS 1 (deadline June 1) and QIS 2 (deadline August 1).Operational Risk
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Structured products
A guide to home equity investments: the untapped real estate asset class
This report covers the investment opportunity in untapped home equity and the growth of HEIs, and outlines why the current macroeconomic environment presents a unique inflection point for credit-oriented investors to invest in HEIs
Podcast: Claudio Albanese on how bad models survive
Darwin’s theory of natural selection could help quants detect flawed models and strategies
Range accruals under spotlight as Taiwan prepares for FRTB
Taiwanese banks review viability of products offering options on long-dated rates
Structured products gain favour among Chinese enterprises
The Chinese government’s flagship national strategy for the advancement of regional connectivity – the Belt and Road Initiative – continues to encourage the outward expansion of Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Here, Guotai Junan International…
Structured notes – Transforming risk into opportunities
Global markets have experienced a period of extreme volatility in response to acute concerns over the economic impact of the Covid‑19 pandemic. Numerix explores what this means for traders, issuers, risk managers and investors as the structured products…
Structured products – Transforming risk into opportunities
The structured product market is one of the most dynamic and complex of all, offering a multitude of benefits to investors. But increased regulation, intense competition and heightened volatility have become the new normal in financial markets, creating…
Increased adoption and innovation are driving the structured products market
To help better understand the challenges and opportunities a range of firms face when operating in this business, the current trends and future of structured products, and how the digital evolution is impacting the market, Numerix’s Ilja Faerman, senior…
Structured products – The ART of risk transfer
Exploring the risk thrown up by autocallables has created a new family of structured products, offering diversification to investors while allowing their manufacturers room to extend their portfolios, writes Manvir Nijhar, co-head of equities and equity…