CVA proxying: Nomura's alternative to "flawed" EBA method

The European Banking Authority has proposed a way for banks to calculate a credit valuation adjustment capital charge when credit default swap spreads are absent or illiquid – but it does not solve the problem, argue Eduardo Epperlein, Kyriakos Chourdakis, Marc Jeannin and James McEwen of Nomura, who have an alternative

two-seahorses-with-tails-intertwined

Click here to view the full article.

Regulators claim two-thirds of the losses suffered by banks in the aftermath of the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 were due to the sliding creditworthiness of derivatives counterparties, so it was no surprise that the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision responded by introducing a new capital charge for the credit valuation adjustment (CVA) that measures this exposure.

What was more surprising was the decision to base the capital charge on credit

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here