data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b7ee/1b7ee75774d893e87323ee70c4896e479b8e24d6" alt="Risk.net"
Fed’s plan to end ‘window dressing’ stirs repo debate
Change to G-Sib surcharge could smooth year-end volatility, but some fear liquidity will worsen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2aaac/2aaac424110796518c4e6ea5608ed74a45e7a23b" alt="G-Sib-window-dressing G-Sib-window-dressing"
A proposed change to the way the US Federal Reserve calculates the capital surcharge for global systemically important banks (G-Sibs) could have profound implications for the repo and derivatives markets.
Banks typically scale back balance sheet-intensive activities such as derivatives and repo trading ahead of deadlines for reporting regulatory metrics that are used to calculate capital add-ons. The practice, known as ‘window dressing’, has contributed to sharp reductions in dealer capacity at
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Markets
For AI’s magic hammer, every problem becomes a nail
Risk.net survey finds banks embracing a twin-track approach to AI in the front office: productivity tools today; transformation tomorrow
Nasdaq leads push to reform options regulatory fee
Proposed rule change would pare costs for traders, raise them for banks and defund smaller venues
AI and Trump tariffs spur hyped-up dispersion trade
Popular vol strategy pays off in January despite highest entry costs on record
Development banks team up for FX hedging push
Banks such as EBRD and World Bank club together to improve emerging market funding tools
TD, Goldman make strides with Ucits in FX forwards trades
Counterparty Radar: JP Morgan AM notional crossed $100 billion threshold in first half of 2024
Esma climbs down on active account reporting rules
Industry in ‘wait-and-see mode’ after Löber comments suggest softer approach by EU regulator
FX defs look to calculation agents for close-out rates
New Isda rule book also set to streamline ‘impossibility’ standard for disruption events
Autocall curbs hit long-dated Nikkei and HSCEI options
Collapsing Asia structured products inventory saps market-makers of long-dated vol supply