Calls for consistency over risk-free rate

The risk-free rate of return that provides the starting point for valuing liabilities has proven more difficult to define in practice than in principle. Practitioners hope for consistency from regulators as they revisit the concept. Blake Evans-Pritchard reports

Kurt Svoboda Uniqa

Only a few years ago, it seemed that everyone was talking about the same thing when it came to valuation of life insurance liabilities. The snapshot of a life company’s financial health, taken at any given point in time, should mirror as closely as possible the reality seen in the markets.

While the financial crisis that began in 2008 did not fundamentally alter the ideas that lie behind market-consistent valuations, it caused people to wonder whether the methodology for applying them might need

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The future of life insurance

As the world constantly evolves and changes, so too does the life insurance industry, which is preparing for a multitude of challenges, particularly in three areas: interest rates, regulatory mandates and technology (software, underwriting tools and…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here