New thinking is needed in the hunt for yield

Insurers have been asking themselves for some time how they can generate investment yield. But perhaps they have been asking the wrong question. The lesson from some in the industry is that success is built on shrewd management as much as bold investment strategies.

Rob Mannix at Insurance Risk

Insurers have been asking themselves for some time how they can generate investment yield. But perhaps they have been asking the wrong question.

For the most part, sourcing yield has proven unexpectedly hard, with heavy demand chasing limited opportunities in areas such as infrastructure. Meanwhile, judging by a recent report from Standard & Poor’s (S&P), some firms are doing well by sticking to more straightforward approaches.

According to the report, the top 14 multi-line firms covered by the rating agency are improving earnings and strengthening their capital position – growing their available capital by about 6% a year.

Interestingly, regulation is playing a role. “We believe uncertainty on a global capital standard for global systemically important insurers might be one of the reasons for the continued capital build-up,” states S&P. “What’s more, future Solvency II regulation in the European Union and remaining ambiguity regarding the conversion of EU regulation into national law might motivate global multi-line firms to prepare for possibly higher requirements.”

At the same time, just how the firms in question are improving their capital foundation bears scrutiny. Yield-hunting in the form of buying riskier assets is notably absent from their list of main activities. Taken together the group has increased exposure to alternative assets by less than 0.1% of total investments year on year, according to S&P.

And yet the impact of low rates is less pronounced for firms in the group than for the rest of the industry, according to the agency. Investment returns have fallen, but not as much as expected. Why? There is no special secret – just doing the right things well. “We think this attests to many global multi-line insurers’ expertise in global asset management,” states the agency.

The firms in question are also benefiting from strategic decisions. They have increased non-life insurance rates, cut costs, re-priced life insurance products and moved away from capital-intensive products towards capital-light alternatives.

It certainly helps to be big and well-diversified with multiple lines of business and a geographic mix of business. Even so, the lesson for others in the industry is that success is built on shrewd management as much as bold investment strategies.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

The future of life insurance

As the world constantly evolves and changes, so too does the life insurance industry, which is preparing for a multitude of challenges, particularly in three areas: interest rates, regulatory mandates and technology (software, underwriting tools and…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here